| 
 |  | 
          
            
              
                
                  
                          
                    Given the
                    fact it's now the longest running show in Broadway history,
                    it would seem  
                    I'm among the last people on Earth to have known next to
                    nothing about The Phantom of the Opera prior to
                    watching this film.  And, of course, if you've been
                    keeping up with my other reviews on this page for the past
                    few years, you may already be aware of a comment I made
                    regarding Moulin Rouge -- one which, to be honest, is
                    quite characteristic of my usual opinion of the musical
                    theater genre.  In it I said, "I always find the unnatural vehicle of almost solely
musical speech a bit off-putting", and I will without hesitation tell you
                    that for at least the first half-hour or so of this (to me
                    new) example of the form, it proved by no means an
                    exception.  In fact, I was so thoroughly frustrated
                    with the "unreal seriousness" of the whole thing
                    at the point wherein the heroine is shown kneeling to light
                    a candle in remembrance of her late father -- her billowing
                    hoop skirt so meticulously arranged without the slightest
                    wrinkle of disarray, every perfectly coiffed tress intact as
                    it falls against her powdered porcelain skin...despite the
                    fact this all follows a performance one can't help realizing
                    would most certainly have at least worked up a bead of sweat
                    or caused one or two of those angelic strands of ringleted
                    gossamer to blow astray -- that I have to fess up to the
                    fact my hand started wandering toward the remote beside me
                    in a plea to end once and for all this groan-inspiring
                    assault on my reason.  However, always hopeful things
                    might improve with perseverance, I managed to successfully
                    contain that urge, and soldiered on.  And, once the
                    title character showed up to balance out the hard to swallow
                    milktoast Raoul we're expected to believe is Christine's
                    once childhood crush (and now potentially great
                    love...?!&*^&*?) -- indeed things began to (quite
                    literally, as it often happened throughout the rest of the
                    show) look up.   
                         I've read reviews criticizing the
                    production for its casting of a far from grotesque figure to
                    portray what was apparently in the original novel by Gaston
                    Leroux a hideous and loathsome creature.  Given the
                    simplistic plot and dramatic appeal of the modern version,
                    however, relies primarily on a love triangle between the
                    Phantom, Christine and Raoul, it would hardly seem plausible
                    that this lovely, talented young woman might be romantically
                    drawn to something with bulging eye sockets in excess of 60
                    years age.  In light of the aforementioned assessment
                    of Raoul's own questionable appeal, however, it becomes
                    pretty easy to believe that a patron of the arts with
                    excellent taste and a fair bit of talent in his own right --
                    albeit with a bit of (disguisable) facial deformity -- 
                    could prove a worthy contender in wooing the lass. And, so
                    at last, we have a film. 
                         And, of course, if one adds murder
                    to the mix, the ever looming sense of tragedy lurking just
                    around the bend, and the genuine uncertainty as to where it
                    all may lead, the overall spectacle becomes a rather
                    engrossing one.  What's more the skillful use of
                    lighting effects, color blooming from black and white
                    transitions, and sets that are truly breathtaking in their
                    beauty and atmospheric qualities as metaphor, one can't help
                    but marvel at the visual as well as emotional artistry of
                    the production as a whole.  
                         Be that as it may, I suppose in the
                    end it all comes down to the fact I'm eternally a sucker for
                    hopeless romanticism, whatever the contrivances used to tug
                    at those heartstrings.  And, in the case of Phantom
                    of the Opera, the primary reason I'm ultimately
                    championing it here is the frame tale in which its set...a
                    tale which occupies only a tiny fraction of the film's more
                    than two-hour running time, but which creates a snow and
                    dust-filled world of shadows that contain the brightest
                    colors of the entire "show".  And, indeed, in
                    a fine example of saving the best for last, it is the final
                    silent image we are left with that speaks the loudest. 
                    For, although the "words" of that image are
                    undeniably bittersweet, yet they also serve as a most
                    eloquent reminder that "silence is the perfectest
                    herald of joy"...and that the beauty of enduring love
                    remains endlessly -- and timelessly -- appealing.
                       
                      
                      
                     
                     
                     | 
                 
              
             
              
                
                  | 
                       
                             
                     | 
                   | 
                  
                     NEW!!!
                    State of
        Grace (1990)
                         
        Before getting to the actual "review" of this particular film,
        I have to explain briefly a couple of related points.  First, it
        may seem extremely odd that I'm only now discovering a film that's been
        around for a decade and a half -- one, incidentally, I'd first heard of
        several years back from an acting teacher/friend (from Brooklyn) who
        referenced it upon learning of a job I'd landed at the time, which
        required rehearsals in Queens (and if you haven't yet seen the film to
        catch that reference, yes, that means Queens is a place of which he was
        less than fond).  Second, I have to myself reference a more recent
        film, (covered a bit further down this page), Ash Wednesday. 
        At the time I first ran across this later work, I found it curious
        that Ed Burns had departed so completely from his usual fare of
        contemporary relationship explorations to return to the 1980's and New
        York City's Irish mob for this particular effort -- and wondered as I
        watched what might have inspired such a drastic change.   
            
        Not long after the ending credits had rolled on State of Grace,
        however, I realized it was very possible Burns had been as taken as I by
        what transpired in the 2 hours leading up to them.  And, it's
        therefore likewise possible his own tale of two brothers in Hell's
        Kitchen might have sprung from the words "what if" regarding
        certain aspects of this one.   
             Be that as it may, it certainly seems likely
        Burns has at some point seen this film...which is more than I can say
        for the "professional" critics whose reviews I looked into
        after seeing it myself -- the most glaringly inaccurate of which labeled
        one of its main characters "psychotic".  Interestingly,
        that character -- Jackie Flannery (impeccably played by Gary Oldman) --
        while indeed quite possible "crazy" (as he himself professes)
        -- is the one whose actions are almost invariably followed by the
        assumedly sane "lead"Terry Noonan (played by the likewise
        excellent Sean Penn).  Interesting as well is the fact that a major
        component of psychosis is said to be a lack of real attachment to other
        people, along with which goes an inability to relate in any real way to
        their feelings, feel compassion for them in return, etc.  Yet, it
        is arguably the fact this particular character feels too much that
        proves his greatest "weakness", and indeed which makes him
        dangerous -- though it's likewise arguable it makes him the most
        dangerous to himself        
            I suppose one can follow the logic of the
        critics, however, if one merely takes at face value all events as they
        unfold, and if one merely dismisses Jack as one of the stereotypical,
        murderous miscreants that populate so many "run-of-the-mill"
        crime dramas.  Of course, such "logic" completely ignores
        the myriad of scenes in which the character appears, the bulk of which
        are constructed to portray an irrepressible individual whose generosity,
        caring and steadfast friendship quickly thwart the "best laid
        plans" that have suddenly brought Terry home. 
             Make no mistake, however; Jackie Flannery is no
        saint.  He himself states at one point that, as a part of his
        "job", he "hurts people" (another interesting irony
        to which, however, is that throughout the first half of the film he
        invariably approaches physical combat in a strictly hand to hand manner;
        it is the supposedly more "controlled" Terry who repeatedly
        pulls a gun.)  After all, Jackie is a product of a culture steeped
        in blood -- both shared and shed -- and he clearly accepts the violence
        and death that are a part of his survival. Yet he also clearly retains
        an uncharacteristic level of respect, compassion, and almost childlike
        joy in living for what one conceives of as a "thug".  As
        the saying goes, "Love covers a multitude of sins", and it
        remains an undeniable fact of Jack's character that this sinner is above
        all else a creature filled with love.   
             What's more, a major driving force behind this
        love seems an astonishing level of hope -- a hope so herculean in its
        strength, it's also quite possibly the single greatest element
        separating State of Grace from the "run-of-the-mill"
        crime dramas noted above. And, it's both the characterization and
        importance of both Jackie's love and hope that the aforementioned
        professional critics have failed to understand.  Roger Ebert, for
        example, so completely missed the point that he described what is
        arguably the key scene depicting the fiercely determined nature of these
        qualities with the words, "[Jackie's] idea of making arson into fun
        is to pour the gasoline between himself and the door, and then see if he
        can run through it without killing himself."  Not exactly. 
             Rather, when Jack breaks Terry in on his first
        "assignment" (working for Jackie's older brother Frank, the
        Irish mob's current leader) he likewise attempts to share with him the
        belief there are possibilities beyond their life of crime -- and offers
        this belief as an invitation, patiently awaiting Terry's assent before
        creating a mock "hell" of very real flames, from which he and
        Terry escape via a fiery "hundred yard dash".  And, in so
        doing, it seems very likely that Jack's mission is not merely to create
        "fun", but much more, to offer Terry the seeds of his own
        faith in one day escaping -- together -- the greater Hell that is at
        present their real life in Hell's Kitchen.   
             Again, in fairness to the critics, though (as
        the above scene indicates), so many of the film's most meaningful themes
        are presented metaphorically -- no one is hit over the head with
        directly idealogical dialogue by any means....which is a part of what
        makes this film deceptive in its lasting appeal.  One is simply on
        the edge of one's seat as tensions mount and actions build, and it's
        only as bits and pieces settle into one's consciousness over time that
        the enormity of what has been experienced is permitted to seep in. 
        As a result, it's debatable whether the entirety of the arson scene's
        meaning is clear even to Terry at the time its taking place, as the
        reasons for and implications of his return to the neighborhood after a
        twelve year absence (which are not revealed until much later)
        necessarily provide a somewhat different perspective -- at first. 
        As time goes on, however, the lasting truth that seeps into Terry's
        consciousness is one described in the Proverb, "there is a friend
        who sticks closer than a brother".  And, it's the bond of
        Terry's and Jack's friendship that ultimately defines Terry's
        character...eventually leading him to conclude there may be no such
        thing as the state of grace he'd once conceived, and lending him the
        courage to seek out his own form of redemption.
                      
                      
                      
              
              
                     
                    
  
                      
                    
 What's more, it's actions
        stemming from the love of this "brotherhood" that lead Terry
                      
                      
             Among the most fascinating film characters I've
        ever encountered, Jackie is a product of a culture steeped in blood --
        both shared and shed -- which has arguably contributed to the hardening
        of many a Hell's Kitchen soul -- including Jackie's older brother (and
        as head of the Irish mob, also Jackie's boss), Frank. Oddly, though, in
        Jackie's case, it becomes increasingly apparent this has merely limited
        his options rather than truly shaped his character.  For, while he
        clearly accepts the violence and death that are a part of his survival,
        yet he retains an uncharacteristic level of respect, compassion, and
        almost childlike joy in living for what one conceives of as a
        "thug".   
             For example, one of the scenes that most
        certainly contributes to that aforementioned misconception of psychosis is
        the manner in which Jackie chooses to exit the scene of an arson (he and
        Terry are committing) -- and while I won't spoil the surprise of that
        here, 
                    
 Before getting to the actual
        "review" of this particular film, I have to explain briefly a
        couple of related points.  First, it may seem extremely odd that
        I'm only now discovering a film that's been around for a decade and a
        half -- one, incidentally, I'd first heard of several years back from an
        acting teacher/friend (from Brooklyn) who referenced it upon learning of
        a job I'd landed at the time, which required rehearsals in Queens (and
        if you haven't yet seen the film to catch that reference, yes, that
        means Queens is a place of which he was less than fond).  Second, I
        have to myself reference a more recent film, (covered a bit further down
        this page), Ash Wednesday.  At the time I first ran
        across this later work, I found it curious that Ed Burns had departed so
        completely from his usual fare of contemporary relationship explorations
        to return to the 1980's and New York City's Irish mob for this
        particular effort -- and wondered as I watched what might have inspired
        such a drastic change.   
            
        Not long after the ending credits had rolled on State of Grace,
        however, I realized it was very possible Burns had been as taken as I by
        what transpired in the 134 minutes leading up to them.  And, it's
        therefore likewise possible his own tale of two brothers in Hell's
        Kitchen might have sprung from the words "what if" regarding
        certain aspects of this one.   
             Be that as it may, it certainly seems likely
        Burns has at some point seen this film...which is more than I can say
        for the "professional" critics whose reviews I looked into
        after seeing it myself -- the most glaringly inaccurate of which labeled
        one of its main characters "psychotic".  Interestingly,
        that character -- Jack Flannery (impeccably played by Gary Oldman) --
        while indeed quite possibly "crazy" (as he himself professes)
        -- is the one whose actions are almost invariably followed by the
        assumedly "sane" Terry Noonan (played by the likewise
        excellent Sean Penn).   
            I suppose one can follow the logic of the
        critics, however, if one merely takes at face value all events as they
        unfold, and if one merely dismisses Jack as one of the stereotypical,
        murderous miscreants that populate so many "run-of-the-mill"
        crime dramas.  Of course, such "logic" completely ignores
        the first half-dozen or so scenes in which the character appears, all of
        which are constructed to portray an irrepressible individual whose
        respect, caring and steadfast friendship quickly thwart the "best
        laid plans" that have suddenly brought Terry home. 
             Make no mistake, however; Jack Flannery is no
        saint.  He himself states at one point that, as a part of his
        "job", he "hurts people" (another interesting irony
        to which, however, is that throughout the first half of the film he
        invariably approaches physical combat in a strictly hand to hand manner;
        it is the supposedly more "controlled" Terry who repeatedly
        pulls a gun.)  But, as the saying goes, "Love covers a
        multitude of sins", and it remains an undeniable fact of Jack's
        character that this sinner is above all else a creature filled with
        love.   
             What's more, a major driving force behind this
        love is an astonishing level of hope -- a hope so herculean in its
        strength, it's also quite possibly the single greatest element
        separating State of Grace from the "run-of-the-mill"
        crime dramas noted above. And, it's both the characterization and
        importance of this hope that the aforementioned professional critics
        have failed to understand.  Roger Ebert, for example, so completely
        missed the point that he described what is arguably the key scene
        depicting the fiercely determined nature of this quality with the words,
        "[Jack's] idea of making arson into fun is to pour the gasoline
        between himself and the door, and then see if he can run through it
        without killing himself."  Not exactly. 
             Rather, when Jack breaks Terry in on his first
        "assignment" (working for Jack's older brother Frank, the
        Irish mob's current leader) he likewise attempts to share with him the
        belief there are possibilities beyond their life of crime -- a part of
        which (as has already been established) is indeed death.  By
        himself creating a mock "hell" of very real flames, from which
        he and Terry escape via a fiery "hundred yard dash", Jack's
        mission is not merely to create "fun", but much more, to offer
        Terry the seeds of his own faith in one day escaping the greater Hell
        that is at present their real life in Hell's Kitchen (...and proving in
        the process he's by no means a person to seek the "easy way
        out" of a difficult situation).  
             Again, in fairness to the critics, though (as
        the above scene indicates), so many of the film's most meaningful themes
        are presented metaphorically -- no one is hit over the head with
        directly idealogical dialogue by any means....which is a part of what
        makes this film deceptive in its lasting appeal.  One is simply on
        the edge of one's seat as tensions mount and actions build, and it's
        only as bits and pieces settle into one's consciousness over time that
        the enormity of what has been experienced is permitted to seep in. 
        As a result, it's debatable whether the entirety of the arson scene's
        meaning is clear even to Terry at the time it's taking place, as the
        reasons for and implications of his return to the neighborhood (which
        are not revealed until much later) necessarily provide a somewhat
        different perspective -- at first.  As time goes on, however, the
        lasting truth that seeps into Terry's consciousness is one described in
        the Proverb, "there is a friend who sticks closer than a
        brother".  And, it's the bond of Terry's and Jack's friendship
        that ultimately defines Terry's character...eventually leading him to
        conclude there may be no such thing as the state of grace he'd once
        conceived, and lending him the courage to seek out his own form of
        redemption.
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                     Of course, what's interesting
        about that misnomer is the fact that a major component of this condition
        is a lack of real attachment to other people, along with which goes an
        inability to relate in any real way to their feelings, feel compassion
        for them in return, etc.  Yet, it is arguably the fact this
        particular character feels too much that proves his greatest
        "weakness" -- and at the same time serves as a catalyst for
        bringing out those who love him's greatest strengths. 
             To back up a bit, however, I should probably
        first explain that the film centers around Terry Noonan (Sean Penn), who
        has returned to his old haunt of Hell's Kitchen after a twelve year
        absence.  And, while much has changed during that time, it quickly
        becomes apparent that still more has stayed the same -- including the
        deep and lasting bond between Terry and his best friend, Jackie Flannery
        (Gary Oldman), to whom Terry turns for assistance in finding
        "work".  Of course, since the mob in this case is a
        true "family" affair, it turns out to be Jackie's older
        brother, Frank, who is 
                      
                      
                     Be that as it may, the character in question (played to heartrending
        perfection by Gary Oldman) is a product of his environment. 
        Steeped in a culture of blood -- both shared and shed -- 
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
              
                    
  
                      
                     http://keywestindiefest.com/indibio2K5.html#screen
                      
                     View
        Sympathy For The Devil Clip (Navy Pier Grand Ballroom, 12-31-04)
                      
                    
  
                    
  
                    
  
                    
  
                    
  
                    
  
                    
  
                      
                      
                     asfunction:nt_connect,0
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      
                      (making theaters seem more like "home" to me)
                      
                      
                    
  
                      
                       
                     
              
                     
                     9th   Mil
        had a another stroke of mad inspiration!!! 
                And, if you're a Michael
        McDermott supporter,  
                you'll definitely want to  CLICK
        HERE to learn 
                how you can be a part of this
        particular insanity!!! 
                 But...time is of the
        essence so be sure to check it out 
                NOW!!!  (P.S. If you
        happen to be Michael 
                himself...don't even THINK of
        clicking above... 
                you'll find out in good time
        what the madness is all 
                about -- provided everyone
        else is likewise up for the 
                              surprise. 
        If not, well then, there's nothing to know anyway!!!)      
                       
                    
View 
Guestbook - - Sign 
Guestbook 
                     
                      
                      
                      
                        
                            | 
                          
                             If I were a work of art, I would be M. C. Escher's Lizards. 
                            I am a bizarre juxtaposition of the real and the unreal.
                Based in the realm of mathematics, my two-dimensional appearance
                belies a complex and free-willed behaviour which both delights
                and confuses people. 
                            Which work of art would you be? The
                Art Test 
                             | 
                         
                      
                     
                     
                      
                      
                     http://www.dcn.com/contest/band_page.jsp?artist_id=7059#
                      
                     
                    
                      
                      
                     Click
        Here to View New Board and/or Post a Message 
                      
                    Test your MM song knowledge on
        this link, it's kind of fun... 
                    Michael
        McDermott Song Game 
                    http://pauperssky.com/curtain/
        (Behind The Curtain Newsletters 2001-2002) 
                    http://www.pauperssky.com/reviews/middle_01.html
        (McD - The Critics Corner) 
                      
                    
                      
                    Michael, Lance and Angelo. Due to
        technical difficulties with his guitar and sound, Michael ended up
        playing Angelo's guitar for most of the show I'm pretty sure. A very
        responsive, attentive crowd got to hear a bunch of new songs, and this
        fan had trouble keeping up with the volume of awesome new material, as
        this rather sketchy set list demonstrates. 
                     
        1.) The American in Me, solo piano, preceded by beginning of My Country
        Tis of Thee 
        2.) A new song, I wrote down title as The Long Way Around, but don't
        know if that's correct. M on piano with Angelo on guitar 
        3.) Misguided Companion, solo piano 
        4.) Arm Yourself M on guitar, Angelo piano, with Lance 
        5.) OK, I think this is another new one and I don't know the title
        although it might be Lamb and the Lion as mentioned by Michael on his
        blog. M was on guitar, Angelo on mandolin, with Lance. Some of the
        lyrics I caught, something to the effect of, "I was a gene pool
        away from looking like Johnny Depp or Daniel Day Lewis." And I
        think that these partial lyrics are part of this same song, "But
        around here it seems like everybody's bleeding. Bleeding for the love of
        one good friend." Then again, this might be a different song. Help! 
        6.) Need Some Surrender, solo piano 
        7.) Antique Store, M on piano, Lance joined halfway through 
        8.) Hold Back a River, M on piano, Angelo on guitar, with Lance 
        9.) Whole Lot Better, song Michael wrote a few days ago, solo guitar.
        Some of the lyrics went like this: "I'm a whole lot better than I
        was yesterday. This old town is haunting. Ghosts I see in every bar. I'm
        not the man I once knew, but I'm not quite yet the man I seek." 
        10.) Long Long Way to Heaven, solo guitar 
        11.) A Wall I Must Climb, M on guitar/harmonica with Angelo on mandolin
        with Lance 
        12.) Baby I M on guitar with Angelo on mandolin, with Lance 
        13.) Didn't write down the name of this song, although I wrote that
        Michael played guitar, Angelo on mandolin, with Lance.... 
        14.) Everything I Got, solo piano 
        15.) Molly Mockingbird, solo piano 
        16.) Something Greater, M on piano with Lance 
        17.) 20 Miles South of Nowhere, M on guitar, Angelo mandolin with Lance 
        18.) Never Going Down Again M on guitar, with Lance 
        19.) Just a Closer Walk With Thee, solo piano 
                     
        Encore 
        20.) Wounded, solo piano 
        21.) Spark, M on piano 
                    
                      
                      
                      
                    
  
                      
                      
                      
                     Brian at Cleveland (audio link) -
        interview
                     www.cleveland.com/entertainment/webcast/clip.ssf?zzDoNotCount?/entertainment/webcast/cmj_fv.frame
                      
                      
                      
                     
                    
                    
                      
                      
                        
                          
                          
                          
                            
                            my most humble thanks
                            
                              
                                
                                 
                                i wish to thank everybody that
                    participated in the mcbirthday present this year...it is
                    truly amazing.... best one yet,
                    if the idea was to give back to me what i've given through
                    the songs...well i guess this next record better knock you
                    out ,to get me back even with the house.
                    This one really knocked me out,....tomorrow i go away to
                    england and i feel fully energized,
                    Like i got the strength of all of you with me...and that is
                    priceless...thank you and God bless you, you made me feel
                    love today....that is a rare and beautiful thing.
                                
                                talk soon...
                                
                                m
                                
                                 
                               
                             
                            
                           
                         
                       
                     
                     
                      
                      
                     28th  Updated my
        MySpace.com page 
                  (added "How
        We Become" to  
                   the jukebox
        and a blog detailing 
                   that song's
        background).  Check it 
                   all out by clicking
        here.  
                     | 
                     
                    
                        |